08 May 2012

A Tragically Foolish Old Woman

There was a little girl who had few friends as a child and even fewer as she grew up.

She didn't know why.
All the children avoided her.

But every child knew exactly why they avoided her.

She didn't share her toys. And she hit the other children.

But there was more.

She would bring big brother with her when she went to the other kids house. He would hide then come in when the other kid wasn't looking.

He would hit and kick the child while she would stand and watch.

It didn't matter how they screamed or cried. She just watched. Sometimes she even left and went home while her brother continued kicking and punching.

Now she was grown.
She still went to their house. She still wanted to play the childish games of youth.

And she still brought her brother with her.

Most - realising this - continued to avoid her.
But she was so persistant.
Day in and out.
Beating at the gate. Sometimes climbing the fence.
Or just peering through.

Sometimes they let her in because she looked so sad and pittiful. Other times because they hoped she'd changed.

But they soon found out. Her brother still hid then came in later. She still hit and kicked. And then her brother would start.


As a result, most still avoided her. But some now began to fight back. To call her the bully and cruel beastly coward she was.

To tell her that no friend treated their friends that way.

They told her, they'd grown up. And that if she ever wanted to come over again she had to CHANGE. 

That's when she screamed that they had to forgive her.
And their eyes went white when she said that she'd already forgiven them.

She said they couldn't hold her brother responsible. He had problems. They needed to understand. And forgive.

Most refused and turned cold.
Her circle of friends continued to dwindle.

Yet she continued to come back. Beating at the gate. Loudly.

Sometimes she pretended nothing had ever happened. Another day, she tried pity, guilt, tears.

And as before. When they wouldn't let her in, she occasionally jumped the fence and had to be thrown out.

That's when she made a scene. Calling the others cruel. Sometimes her brother was there as well to hurl insults and accusations.

In the end - she only had two friends left. One no longer human. Clearly a broken horse that no longer resisted the abuse and beatings. He stood lifeless and senseless.

Then there was her brother.
Oh. Yes. You probably guessed. He WAS mentally sick. And Yes. He also beat her.

And that is how this old woman died. Alone with no friends. Even her family had long since tired of her abuse.

She had no one except for the man who beat her and the broken one she beat.

And with her dying breath she bleated: But, they have to forgive me. She repeated this again and again.

As if the repetition would make it come true. But what she never in her life faced was that forgiveness is not just a one way street.

To be truly be forgiven --in heaven and on earth-- as they teach in the 12 step programs, one must admit errors, stop doing that which is wrong and make amends where possible. 

But the true and sad tragedy is that this foolish old woman dies never taking responsibility, never doing what is right, never facing the truth of life and most of all - never living.

As she breathes her last, her dying thoughts torment her with guilt and self-pity.

03 May 2012

Is Tax One Of Your Sacred Cows?

Tax is a bit of a sacred cow in most countries today. Not sure?
That's OK.

Here. Let me show you. I'm going to propose something that will probably shock you. It may even anger you. In fact -- you may want to start calling me names or worse once you read it.

If you have even a hint of such a reaction - then this IS a sacred cow for you.

Ready?

We should drop the current so-called "progressive" system of taxation in favor of a "regressive". Actually those names are as inaccurate as when they first started calling that beautiful oasis in the North Atlantic, Iceland to ward off other hungry explorers, greedy for conquest and gain. Then they called that nearly useless block of ice, Greenland.

See?

Same deal with "progressive" and "regressive".
The former sounds so, well, progressive. Modern and enlightened. And that is how it is passed off. Of course it refers to a system that progressively INcreases the tax rate or percentage the MORE one earns.
Punishing productivity.

Then we have regressive. Which - again - sounds backward, medieval & dark. In such a system, one's tax rate DEcreases the more she earns.

Ahhh.... And therein lies the rub.
The current system of so-called progressive taxation --- as we all know --- is designed to PUNISH those with higher and higher earnings.

At the risk of sounding patronizing, let me repeat for clarity. That means one is REWARDED for earning LESS.  Rewarded for being LESS productive. And PUNISHED for producing more. For being more economically competent and diligent.

Hmmmm....
See the problem here?
Consider that in any system -- you get more of the behavior you reward.
In the home, schools, businesses, hospitals, government offices, prisons.... any place people gather and work together.   
If you reward the behavior you DON'T want, you will get more of it.

Conversely, it is common knowledge that when the desired behaviors are acknowledged and rewarded institutions get what they want.

To illustrate this, let's as what would happen if we used the same logic for the law.

Generally speaking an offender will receive a LONGER sentence for Murder 1, than for Murder 2. And likewise, Murder 2 is more harshly treated than Murder 3.
Just a little refresher.

Murder One is planned and premeditated. Murder in cold blood so to speak. Murder Two could more accurately be called a crime of passion. And of course, Murder Three is basically killing by negligence.

What would our system of law and justice look like IF --- as with "progressive" taxes --- the law deal lightly with the most heinous behavior and harshly with trivial offenses?

To illustrate my point, indulge me.
What if we had a system that meted out the harshest punishment for Murder 3 and the lightest for Murder 1?

Insane - Right?
Unbelievable. Twisted.

Back to our question of taxation.
How is Punishing people for earning MORE money any different?

Are you angry yet?
Are you defending the current system?

Why?
Because you've never known anything else? Or because it really is the best?

All right. Let's just say for a moment it IS somehow the "right" thing to do.
That somehow punishing the most productive members of society is good.

But --- even if that be so --- by the simple law of human nature and psychology
won't we tend to get more of what we reward?

Won't the countries with the most "progressive" systems tend to get poorer and poorer?
And those jurisdictions with less "progressive" tax policies richer and richer?

If you're like me, you see that -- even though it might still feel a bit strange because
of the propaganda we've been force-fed our whole life -- a REGRESSIVE
tax makes a lot of sense.

Let's go one step further and imagine a regressive system for a moment:

In a regressive system of taxation, the bottom earners would pay the highest rate.
Let's say we split the population into 4 tiers.
The bottom 20 percentile
The middle 20 - 80 percentile and
The top, from 80 - 99
And then the top 1 percent.

Let's say the people earning the least pay 25% tax.
The middle pay 15%
Those from 80-99 percentile 5%.
And the top 1% pay NO tax at all.

Would YOU be motivated to earn more money?



So --- How did you do? Is Tax a Sacred Cow for YOU?

If you did, it's OK.
The important thing is to begin thinking...and questioning.
Being willing to examine things we've taken for granted up till now.
To slay sacred cows where ever we find
them.
Because we ALL have them. It's just human nature. We all have blind spots.
The mark of humanity, though, is to have fewer and fewer as one grows in years
and hopefully wisdom.

But just be forewarned. when you begin slaying your sacred cows,
I hope you'll be careful who you share your views with.

Because there are vast numbers of people ready to kill for their beliefs.
Beliefs which most have never examined or questioned.


We see many of those people on the TV and in the newspapers shouting that they are
part of the 99% and proud of it.

Well --- this may be the subject for another post, but I wouldn't never proudly
shout that I was part of the 99%.

I have too much respect for and understanding of the contribution the top 1% make to bad
mouth them.

Anyway - I vote for a regressive tax system that rewards the most productive, intelligent
diligent humans. Not one that progressively kills the golden goose...

How About You?